Dependency-Directed Reconsideration Belief Base Optimization for Truth Maintenance Systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
We define reconsideration, a non-prioritized belief change operation on a finite set of base beliefs. Reconsideration is a hindsight belief change repair that eliminates negative effects caused by the order of previously executed belief change operations. Beliefs that had previously been removed are returned to the base if there no longer are valid reasons for their removal. This might result in less preferred beliefs being removed, and additional beliefs being returned. The end product is an optimization of the belief base, converting the results of a series of revisions to the very base that would have resulted from a batch revision performed after all base beliefs were entered/added. Reconsideration can be done by examining the entire set of all base beliefs (both currently believed and retracted) — or, if the believed base is consistent, by examining all retracted beliefs for possible return. This, however, is computationally expensive. We present a more efficient, TMS-friendly algorithm, dependency-directed reconsideration (DDR), which can produce the same results by examining only a dynamically determined subset of base beliefs that are actually affected by changes made since the last base optimization process. DDR is an efficient, anytime, belief base optimizing algorithm that eliminates operation order
منابع مشابه
Base Belief Change and Optimized Recovery
Optimized Recovery (OR) adds belief base optimization to the traditional Recovery postulate—improving Recovery adherence without sacrificing adherence to the more accepted postulates or to the foundations approach. Reconsideration and belief liberation systems both optimize a knowledge base through consolidation of a chain of base beliefs; and recovered base beliefs are returned to the base. Th...
متن کاملTruth Maintenanoe Systems for Problem Solving
This report describes progress that has been made in the ability of a computer system to understand and reason about its own reasoning faculties. A new method for representing knowledge about beliefs has been developed. This representation, called a non-monotonic dependency system, extends several similar previous representation forms for such knowledge, and has been employed in developing new ...
متن کاملBelief Change with Reconsideration
Given a knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) system, this paper introduces the concept of reconsideration — where past belief change operations can be reconsidered. Specifically, beliefs retracted during past revisions might be returned to the belief base. . . and, conversely, base beliefs retained during previous revisions might be lost. We show the need for reconsideration in both ide...
متن کاملReconsideration on Non-Linear Base Orderings
Reconsideration is a belief change operation that re-optimizes a finite belief base following a series of belief change operations—provided all base beliefs have a linear credibility ordering. This paper shows that linearity is not required for reconsideration to improve and possibly optimize a belief base.
متن کاملUn système de maintenance de la vérité à propagation de contextes. (A context-propagation based truth maintenance system)
Hypothetical reasoning consists in completing available knowledge to achieve reasoning. In order to help hypothetical reasoning, specific algorithms are designed which efficiently deal with hypothesis and their consequences, and moreover allow an automatic hypothesis generation. This last consideration leads to implement a nonmonotonic reasoning. Truth maintenance systems (TMS) record the infer...
متن کامل